20.4.09

BCC: Pricing for success - an interview with Pol Vanaerde, President of ePP

Quoting a well-known study ‘The Price Advantage’, a 1% enhancement in the pricing management translates into an 11% profit growth. Hence, the potential for improvements is immense. Pol Vanaerde, President of European Pricing Platform, talks about the concept and main goals of ePP and how to improve the pricing policy. What was the idea behind the birth of the European Pricing Platform? The idea of sharing best pricing practices started from a group of pricing managers who attended my training session on strategic pricing. The group asked me whether I could facilitate somehow their networking and experience sharing. After some informal workshop meetings, the idea emerged to set up the European Pricing Platform, offering a more complete range of workshops, training events and interactive discussions. This first group of pricing mangers decided to fund the initiative with a ‘participation fee’, which made it possible to invest in a portal site www.pricingplatform.eu to share the contents and tools.

What are the main goals of ePP? The European Pricing Platform (ePP) is the first open European network focusing on supporting the pricing decision makers in a wide variety of industries and sectors. The ePP supports all qualitative ‘pricing’ initiatives and shares the knowledge with its participants. The mission of the ePP is to be the on- and offline meeting place for European pricing decision makers and pricing academics. The ePP helps pricing decision makers to put pricing on the CEO agenda and creates a platform to extend the network of pricing professionals where they can find and share pricing knowledge, search and post jobs, and build relations. The ePP supports pricing decision makers with knowledge development, sharing sources of knowledge, tools and technologies in the complex environment of strategic pricing by means of trainings, workshops, seminars, congresses and publications.

How does ePP works? The ePP provides cross-business answers to the latest pricing challenges. By combining on- and offline media (workshops, seminars, training events, in-companies, webinars, round tables, portal site, etc.). Companies gain inside knowledge and cross industry insights needed in order to benchmark their pricing strategies, they maintain critical competitive advantages and ensure maximum value capturing. Participants enhance their pricing know-how through interactive trainings and workshops, in which they get state-of-the-art pricing knowledge. Our most popular training events at the moment include: Strategic Pricing, Euro Pricing, The Pricing Toolbox, FMCG Pricing, Value Based Pricing, Pricing in more difficult times, B2B Value Selling, etc. Of course, the ePP also offers pricing decision makers an opportunity for peer-to-peer contacts with European pricing decision makers to share the best cross-industry practices. To assure high quality and practical relevance of the initiatives, in each country the ePP is empowered by a strong reference board of pricing professionals. Reference boards guarantee excellent performance of the platform in each country and monitor the delivery of top quality activities. In 2009, the ePP launches “The PricingFuel Days” which will be held twice a year (starting in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands). In 2008 we cooperated with Pros Pricing, a leading provider of pricing and revenue optimization software products, on the organisation of “The European Pricing Forum – 2008” held in Frankfurt. It was the year’s most comprehensive event dedicated to pricing and revenue optimization excellence. We also organize a yearly European Pricing Thesis Award sponsored by Vodafone, KLM and TNT Express. The idea behind this award is to promote pricing with graduates and young professionals. After all, the need for pricing expertise will increase significantly in the coming years. Knowledge development of pricing strategies, software, tools and tactics are key elements for organizations aiming at sustainable growth and value capturing. Only few organizations have pricing managers today. As the need for more talent will seriously increase, students who focus on the pricing subject might be one step ahead of others at the moment they enter the career market. We herewith stimulate a new generation of professionals starting their careers with fundamental and applied knowledge in the pricing area which is the driver behind the European Best Pricing Master Thesis Award.

Who are the participants and experts of ePP? Our participants are high level executives, CxO’s and managers interested in learning more about pricing. At the moment we have over one hundred top companies who joined our Pricing platform. Our academics are lecturers and professors at European universities, linking academic knowledge to managerially-relevant pricing knowledge and solutions We have partners in different businesses which can be classified under different titles: pricing experts, pricing research experts, and pricing technology experts.

What benefits can ePP participants expect? EPP participants get discounts on state-of-the-art interactive workshops and seminars. They also enjoy a discount of 10% on all ePP trainings, and a 15% discount on the Pricing Conferences partnering with – and endorsed by - the ePP around Europe. Participants can also download all the ePP workshop presentations free of charge and have free access to the list of “need to read” articles. Besides this, participants are getting a promotional rate on the Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management. Furthermore, as a participant you have access to a focused network of pricing professionals, which is more specific than most open business networks. As a participant of the ePP, you can always rely on the support of the ePP office team when having Pricing enquiries. On the ‘Pricing Blog’ ePP participants have access to the latest pricing news. Finally, the ePP offers its participants several on- and offline possibilities to share experience and knowledge, connections and networking.

What would be the first step for a company that wishes to improve their pricing? Companies without pricing strategies often have a lack of control over the pricing process and price setting. These companies frequently have ineffective basic price processes, lack of procedures or poor control over the procedures and no clearly defined pricing RACI-models. They usually use cost-plus or break even pricing and are faced with day-to-day price fire-fighting. For these companies, to gain control and working towards a descent pricing strategy is the first step. Starting with a pricing audit is the best way. Price leakages can be fixed, procedures for price setting and pricing discipline are put in place. Often, a minimum price reporting is installed, and a competitor price watch and lost/won client analysis is in place. Once these elements are under control, it is time to install a pricing team, appoint one or more price managers and define their roles. Periodic pricing reviews are conducted, and these companies start using more complex techniques such as price segmentation, use of value based pricing, price guidance/segment, etc. This doesn’t mean the end of the journey. There still remains the need to implement price KPI’s and a price control dashboard. It’s also the time to integrate the bonus systems to align everyone around the pricing strategy.

How can the software tools help in improving pricing? Software tools can help to take control over data, delivering fact-based information which is often the first hurdle to take starting with pricing. Software tools can also be necessary to define behavioural price segmentation, install price guidance per segment, support sales with pricing tools and start yield management.

What kind of tools are these? Although Excel can help a lot at the start, in a further step to pricing excellence you will need other software if you have to deal with large-scale data gathering, typical for industries with thousands of ‘price points’ (energy, telecom, travel, banking, etc.). Most often, extra software is needed as a layer ‘above SAP’ to extract relevant pricing intelligence.

What kind of investments a company needs to improve pricing? We often see that companies are best helped when they start with a pricing audit to understand the actual challenges and opportunities in pricing. The investment for an audit has to be estimated. Implementation of the advice is typical project management but if the company has pricing managers to support the implementation, investment expenditures at this stage can be kept low.

How fast can you get return on the investment? Based on my experience, I could say that the margins can raise from 3% to 7% in 6 to 12 months, which makes it an extremely worthwhile investment.

What is the role of pricing policy now in the time of recession? As the European Pricing platform we advise companies to analyse the changing buying patterns and market dynamics first. Fear and aggression are very effective profit killers. Nowadays the reasonable pricing strategy is even more important than in the time of prosperity. Why not come to our next training: ‘Pricing Management in more difficult times’. We share concrete practices helping to increase margins without increasing prices.

Interviewed by Mirosława Huk, BCC

Pol Vanaerde has a successful marketing strategy track-record. He was responsible for the European launch of Alpro Soyfoods. Elected as product marketer of the year in Belgium. Later joined MC. Bride PLC (private label detergents & Cosmetics) as European Marketing Manager and Conoco-Philips as New Business Manager. Pricing was always one of the key responsibilities. Founder of Vanaerde Consulting, Truemarketeers and TruePricingexperts. Guest speaker at Vlerick Leuven/Gent Management School, University of Brussels, VNO/NCW the Netherlands, and in a wide portfolio of in-companies, seminars and conferences in different industries all over Europe. He is the initiator and president of the European Pricing Platform.

Marcin Gałczyński, Sales and Distribution Team Leader, BCC: Pricing in SAP The insight into buying habits of our customers is based on the sales data analyzed in terms of the volume of sales to particular customers, their size, location or industry. Thanks to the use of Business Intelligence tools we can prepare segmentation of our customers from the point of view of similar buying behaviors. This is the first step in employing an IT system to support the company’s price management and sales processes. For a company which uses a SAP ERP system, SAP BI will be a natural choice. It seems worthwhile to invest in the development of pricing tools which will help to define prices for particular customer segments in a transparent way and to implement SAP Workflow tools supporting price changing and approval of the sales offers and orders. The defined prices, supplemented with additional pricing thresholds calculated on the basis of SAP BI analyses (minimum price, last purchase, estimated price the customer is ready to pay, sales target) can be displayed to the sales representative at the time and place of closing the sales deal. Equipped with such comprehensive data, the sales representative will be able to prepare the optimum proposal for the customer, meeting all their expectations. The development of detailed aspects of such solutions requires extensive knowledge and experience or support of an external partner. Furthermore, implementation of dedicated pricing tools which can be integrated with SAP can also be considered. Their suppliers usually offer ready-made reference models for various industries which considerably facilitate implementation and allow for quicker return on investment. The implementation of such solutions is a project comparable in size to a small rollout of an ERP system. The examples of software worth recommending include PROS Pricing Solution Suite and SAP Price and Margin Management by Vendavo.

Source: http://www.english.bcc.com.pl/index.php?s=5&nWMact=2&nid=535

17.4.09

Variable Pricing

Variable pricing has now been implemented at the iTunes music store. In April 2009 , based on what the music labels charge Apple, songs on iTunes will be available at one of three price points-69 cents, 99 cents and $1.29-with many more songs priced at 69 cents than $1.29. Interesting as Amazon's uncomfortably similar top 10 list has all these tracks priced at $0.99 (encoded as DRM-free 256kbps VBR MP3). A handful of tracks (nine in the top 100) do hit the higher $1.29 price further down Amazon's list. Now, if you believe Steve Jobs, labels are charging Apple more for the rights to sell its music than Amazon. This info is based on a quote attributed to Steve Jobs in the Apple press release from January.

Ask customers to pay whatever they want and earn money

In October 2007 the British band Radiohead launched their latest album – In Rainbows - on the Internet. The band allowed fans to download the album freely and offer, in retribution, any amount of money they would like. If consumers were purely self-interested agents seeking to maximize the value and minimize the costs of their transactions, such a pricing strategy should have proven disastrous for the band. Actually, if that would be the way consumers behave no one should have decided to pay anything for the album. Yet, in 2008 Thom Yorke, Radiohead’s lead singer, disclosed that the download of their new album generated more profit than the accumulated downloads from all previous albums. Why did Radiohead fans decide to pay for such downloads when given the option to pay nothing? One could argue that the devotion of fans to their favorite rock artists might lead them to deviate from pure self-interest. Researchers Ju-Young Kim, Martin Natter and Martin Spann decided to explore this phenomenon and better understand how consumers react to ‘pay what you want’ (PWYW) pricing mechanisms. Social norms They found that fairness concerns and social norms seem to guide consumers and guarantee a fair payment to the seller. In particular, consumers seem to have a natural tendency to be fair or fear social disapproval if they decide to pay a low price for the product or service they purchase. However, the amount consumers decided to pay was also driven by their satisfaction with the quality of the product or service received and by economic considerations (i.e. depended on the consumers’ income and price consciousness). Variable costs Consequently, it seems that PWYW is profitable when variable costs are low (even though fixed costs might be relatively high) and when the amount consumers decide to pay is visible to others. In fact, the authors disclaim that this mechanism might be inadequate for high-priced transactions, where fairness and social concerns might be insufficient to guarantee a fair price to the seller. Still, in many daily transactions such a pricing scheme might be profitable. These results were obtained by conducting pricing experiments in three different types of transactions: (1) restaurant meals, (2) cinema tickets and (3) hot beverages in a delicatessen store. They convinced managers to specify an experimental period where they would let customers decide what price to pay. The authors then recorded the sales before and during the experimental period and information about consumers’ income, reference price and attitudes (fairness, altruism, price consciousness, and satisfaction). Higher In the restaurant and cinema, as expected, the average price paid by each customer decreased. However, such decrease was not as large as managers might have feared. In the restaurant the average prices dropped by 19.37 percent and in the cinema by 28.72 percent. In the case of the delicatessen the results were even more striking. In this case the average price paid was even 10.62 percent higher during the PWYW period. In terms of revenue the situation was even better. Probably due to its novelty, innovativeness and, eventually, sense fairness and trustworthiness, the pricing mechanism attracted a significant number of new customers which contributed to an increase in revenues in the case of the restaurant, despite the decrease in average price paid per customer. The experiment was so successful that the restaurantowner decided to keep the pricing mechanism after the experiment and started making plans to open a second restaurant using the same pricing format as a positioning strategy.
. Source door: Ju-Young Kin, Martin Natter and Martin Spann in: Journal of Marketing

30.3.09

The second internet bubble

During the past years, consumers become used to many things to get for free: news, stock quotes, music, e-mail to high-speed Internet sites. Today, the dotcom doesn't make the news anymore with free offers, it's focuses now on mass layoffs and the announcement that they will ask money for their services. " The above sentence is from the magazine The Economist in April 2001, but it's just as well applicable to the situation today. During the dotcom boom many companies hoped to gain market share by giving away things for free. But that was not done with the dotcom crash as a result. Other companies tried different business models and asked their customers for money, but few succeeded in that purpose. But in 2004, when Google went to the stock trade, the term Web 2.0 was introduced, a new Internet bubble was created. Buried business models rised from the grave. Money would be made through Google Ads, small contextual ads that were placed next to text and Google quickly became a near-monopoly. New Internet stars light up the firmament: MySpace, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter today. And again, there was offered a 'free lunch'. Free services were offered to a large mass, with the hope for a next stage to earn money from Google Ads, a model that so far only ... Google had worked. And just as in 2001, it brings us once again into the reality. The number of companies that live on Google Ads is much smaller than was first hoped, Silicon Valley didn't escaped to mass redundancies. Services such as MySpace and YouTube succeeded in time to find shelter in large companies (News Corporation and Google) and put the profitability problem neatly placed there. But how those services, like Twitter and Facebook, will be able to make enough money needed to continue, it still remains unclear. The free model has become a vicious circle: more and more companies find themselves increasingly required to offer free services to even slightly compete with existing services. Because Internet services are anyway cheap, more and more companies offer free services.The question how money will be earned is put further forward. The bottom line is however simple: companies that make no money cannot survive and the Google Ads are fun and nice, but not enough. Free news and other services were a charming idea. But the lesson of two Internet bubbles is that eventually someone somewhere will have to pay the price.

'De afgelopen jaren zijn consumenten gewend geraakt om allerlei zaken gratis te krijgen: nieuws, beurskoersen, muziek, e-mail, tot snelle internettoegang toe. Vandaag halen de dotcoms het nieuws niet meer met gratis aanbiedingen, wel met massa-ontslagen en met de aankondiging dat ze geld zullen vragen voor hun diensten.' Bovenstaande zin komt uit het magazine The Economist van april 2001, maar hij is net zo goed van toepassing op de situatie vandaag. Tijdens de dotcom boom hoopten vele bedrijven marktaandeel te winnen door zaken gratis weg te geven in de hoop er in een tweede fase geld aan te kunnen verdienen via advertenties. Maar dat gebeurde niet, met de dotcom crash als gevolg. Andere bedrijven probeerden andere businessmodellen uit en vroegen hun klanten om geld, maar weinigen slaagden in dat opzet. Maar in 2004, toen Google naar de beurs trok en de term Web 2.0 zijn intrede deed, werd een nieuwe internetbubbel gecreëerd. Begraven businessmodellen verrezen uit het graf. Geld zou gemaakt worden dankzij de Google Ads, kleine contextuele advertenties die naast teksten werden geplaatst en waarop Google al snel een bijna-monopolie wist te verkrijgen. Nieuwe internetsterren lichtten op aan het firmament: MySpace, YouTube, Facebook en vandaag Twitter. En ook nu was er opnieuw een ‘free lunch'. Gratis diensten werden aangeboden om een grote massa te bereiken, met de hoop om in een volgend stadium geld te verdienen aan Google Ads, een model dat tot dan toe enkel voor ... Google had gewerkt. En net als in 2001 belanden we ook nu opnieuw in de realiteit. Het aantal bedrijven dat leeft van Google Ads is veel kleiner dan eerst werd verhoopt; Silicon Valley ontsnapt opnieuw niet aan massa-ontslagen. Diensten als MySpace en YouTube slaagden er op tijd in onderdak te vinden bij grote bedrijven (News Corporation en Google) en legden het winstgevendheidprobleem netjes daar neer. Maar hoe deze diensten, net als Twitter en Facebook trouwens, er in zullen slagen om genoeg geld te maken om overeind te blijven, blijft tot vandaag onduidelijk. Het gratis model is ondertussen een vicieuze cirkel geworden: steeds meer bedrijven zien zich verplicht steeds meer diensten gratis aan te bieden om nog enigszins te kunnen concurreren met bestaande diensten. Omdat internetdiensten sowieso goedkoop zijn, bieden ook steeds meer bedrijven gratis diensten aan en wordt de vraag hoe ooit geld zal kunnen worden verdiend almaar verder vooruitgeschoven. Wie start met het idee om snel geld te gaan verdienen, komt gewoon niet aan de bak. Maar de bottom line is nochtans eenvoudig: bedrijven die geen geld verdienen kunnen niet overleven en de Google Ads zijn leuk en aardig, maar onvoldoende. Gratis nieuws en andere diensten vormden een bekoorlijk idee. Maar de les van twee internetbubbels is dat ergens iemand uiteindelijk de rekening zal moeten gaan betalen.

23.3.09

Pricing can be difficult

Finding right balance can make or break business. Consider type of product; calculate your costs ''How much should I charge?'' It's one of the first questions most small business owners ask. It's not an easy one to answer. Setting a pricing strategy depends on many factors — among them, the type of product or service offered, costs to provide it, expected profit, customer's location and the ''going rate'' for your industry. Finding the right balance among these factors is more art than science. Pricing too low can cut into your profits, while overpricing can hurt your business. Large companies can afford marketing staffs that spend a great deal of time trying to get the ''right'' price. A small business doesn't have that luxury. A common error is pricing too low to attract customers. While special deals can work in some cases to get a relationship started, going low is not always the best path. Low prices can draw customers interested only in price. They are likely to abandon you the moment they find something even lower. The low-price strategy can be a fatal game. Raising prices after you have established a low base is often difficult, if not impossible. Low prices designed to attract customers can be even more precarious for service businesses. You have only so many hours to sell. Your business can't make it up in volume like a retailer, who still profits from lower prices if volume is high enough. Competing only on price is not a sustainable business model. It must be combined with other products or services to yield adequate profits. Quality and service are other distinguishing factors. Pricing is an ongoing process, so test your pricing periodically. You might need to adapt to changing conditions. Competitor prices, your own costs, customer perceptions and your profit expectations can all change. Or you might want to simply test different pricing levels to see what works best for your business. Research the norms for your industry, including price ranges across your market area. You might want to charge more or less, depending on your product or service. Make sure you use timely and accurate information to calculate your costs for labor, supplies and direct and indirect overhead for every product or service you offer. ''Guesstimates'' are not good enough and might cost you far more than the time of your research. Also take into account seasonality that might cause short-term cost or increase fluctuations.