Showing posts with label Price Setting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Price Setting. Show all posts

5.10.11

Pricing of the Apple iPhone 4S


Apple iPhone 4S pricing designed to widen its appeal

Apple iPhone 4S pricing designed to widen its appeal

Apple concentrates on price rather than innovation to widen customer base; Samsung and HTC premium phones likely gain advantage, but lower prices put pressure on Nokia and RIM, say analysts



Apple’s strategy with the newly unveiled iPhone 4S is all about selling more phones. Rather than putting an innovative but more expensive device in the hands of a smaller audience, it has opted to target the mid-tier consumer and widen its customer base.
The move is being seen as Apple’s attempt to grow its market share in the face of the Android onslaught spearheaded by Samsung, HTC and others.
Apple’s is ranging the iPhone 3GS free on a two-year contract, while the iPhone 4 model will be cut to just the 8GG version, priced at $99. The iPhone 4S 16GB will cost $199, the 32GB $299 and the 64Gb will cost $399.
Francisco Jeronimo, research manager, European mobile devices at analyst IDC, said: ‘Despite the upgrades and the new iPhone 4S released, the announcement is all about price positioning. The new prices announced to the new iPhone 4S and previous iPhone versions allow Apple to compete in the price segments where Android is fiercely growing, the mid-range.
‘Apple will attract first-time smartphone users and users from mid-price Symbian devices looking for an upgrade, but will it attract current iPhone users to replace their current iPhones? Definitely not!
Jeronimo believes this will provide an opportunity for Samsung and HTC’s premium handsets to increase their market share as iPhone 4 users look for an alternative.
‘The Samsung Galaxy S II has been a major hit around the world and a serious competitor to the iPhone. HTC has also been increasing market share in the high-end segment,’ said Jeronimo. ‘Without a significant hardware differentiation there's no strong incentive for a massive replacement, as users can just upgrade their iPhone 4's with the new iOS 5.’
Jeronimo pointed out that Apple will be ‘better positioned to compete in the mid-range segments and increase its presence in the emerging markets, where price is still a major factor on the purchasing decision’.
He went on to say that Nokia and Research in Motion should be the most threatened phone makers. ‘If price was an inhibitor for consumers to move from their Symbian or BlackBerry based devices to the iPhone, now they have the change. Today Apple entered the mass market game, hopefully not leaving the innovation and coolness to their competitors.’
Editor: James Atkinson 

Source: http://www.mobiletoday.co.uk/News

17.3.11

Amazon’s Android Appstore app Pricing Strategy Revealed

With Amazon’s Android Appstore expected to launch later this month, the internet retailer is busy organising its store to soon offer applications to run on the devices it sells.

Today, a number of Android applications and their prices have leaked out after AndroidNews.de stumbled upon a placeholder page on the Amazon website. Whilst the retail giant will require Android users to download a third-party application to download the apps, Amazon will showcase apps on its product pages, listing them as recommended items as they would any other item.

The page was available at amazon.com/apps but has since been removed. Luckily, a number of screenshots were captured, showing what apps are likely to be available at launch and how much they will cost:

Amazon has already secured the exclusive launch of the next game from the incredibly popular Angry Birds franchise, Angry Birds Rio. With 48 other applications listed on the website, AndroidNews.de compared them and their Android Market counterparts, finding that Amazon has secured four other exclusive titles, including Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Force Recon.

The retailer has also priced 14 apps lower than the prices developers are charging for the same apps on Google’s marketplace. The strategy demonstrates how Amazon hopes to compete with Google – requiring developers to state the recommended retail price of their apps, changing its pricing should it see fit. Developers don’t miss out – if Amazon lowers the price of an app below the recommended price, they will still receive a share of the price they originally set.

Amazon has declined to comment on when its Appstore will launch – we think it won’t be too long until it does.

Source: The Next Web, Matt Brian


2.11.10

The Price is Complicated

Pricing is not about one number. By determining your worth and building value perception around that, your pricing strategy can strengthen brand perception and differentiation.

Setting the right price points is no easy task. In today’s post-recessionary economy, product pricing is particularly tricky because consumers’ perception of value is confounding and seems to shift constantly. People will camp out overnight for the chance to buy a $499 iPad, but you can’t seem to spark any interest in a $4.99 burger combo.

You may not be able to predict how consumers will behave, but you can use pricing to your advantage. The solution lies in taking a strategic approach to pricing decisions. But even before we get into strategy, I need to challenge some conventional wisdom about setting prices.

Many chains use a cost-plus approach. That is, prices are based on food costs plus a labor charge and an overhead factor. The problem with cost-plus pricing is that it is a short-term, inside-out approach. Not only does it leave you vulnerable to variability in commodities pricing, but it also doesn’t reflect the full margin potential of your offerings. Customers may be willing to pay more for some items, but cost-plus pricing essentially treats all products the same. Pricing should be decided from the outside in.

Given Subway’s success with its $5 Footlong promotion, you may think you need to match or beat it, or find your own magic price point. But trying to find that magic number is like searching for the Holy Grail—it’s likely a fruitless and frustrating endeavor, because pricing isn’t about one number. Instead of trying to figure out the threshold that customers won’t give you permission to exceed, determine what your offering is worth and use your pricing strategy to set customers’ value perceptions accordingly.

There is no single price or pricing strategy that works for every chain. Audits and analyses of competitor’s pricing are crucial inputs to your price setting, but the point is not to simply copy other’s approaches. You should approach pricing as thoughtfully and strategically as your menu. ”I say we give up those antiquated approaches and adopt some new ways of thinking about pricing. Price should be considered a touch point through which you express your brand and customers experience it. Pricing strategy should be aligned with your brand strategy. That is, you should use your brand image and positioning to drive price decisions—and in turn, use pricing to strengthen your competitive advantage and brand differentiation. Here are some ways to set your pricing strategy.

Reinforce your brand identity. Use price to communicate what your brand stands for. For example, if your brand is about 1950s-style fast food, then price your offerings with that style. You probably can’t charge ’50s prices, but you can price your offering for an even dollar amount instead of using today’s 99-cent convention—and offer classic combos for classic prices. If your brand is about offering healthy alternatives, ensure your healthier offerings are priced lower than the more mainstream ones—and definitely don’t charge more for substituting a healthy ingredient like soy milk or fat-free cheese.

Be clear about your competitive positioning. Don’t be afraid to charge more if you’re competing on quality, exclusivity, or a superior experience. Starbucks’ recent 9 percent same-store sales increase results prove that customers are willing to pay a price premium even in this economy. On the other hand, if you’re a low-price player, keep your prices low across the board—even one or two higher-priced products can detract from your position. Consider making a claim like “everything under $1.99 every day” and don’t offer combos that add higher price points to your menuboard.

Vary price to emphasize brand differentiation and value. Variable pricing draws attention to the value you offer or to the one dimension that most meaningfully differentiates you from competitors. If your burgers are your best product, pricing them higher than other menu items communicates their uniqueness. If special fries are your most popular menu item, sell all of your products with a side of fries and set your prices accordingly.

Vary price to target customer segments. You can also use variable pricing to appeal to certain customer segments. If you want to attract families, price your offerings to favor quantities and selections appropriate for family purchases. If dine-in customers are more desirable than take-out, consider a separate menu with special prices (and perhaps special products) for them. If you want to grow your breakfast daypart, accept a lower margin for those items.

Anchor your pricing. Price anchoring uses cues to set the customer’s expectations. Those TV infomercials that claim their new gizmo is “a $50 value that’s available today for only $19.99” use price anchoring to increase the perceived value of their offering. Wegman’s grocery stores show competitors’ prices on their shelves to prove their items are competitively priced. And car dealerships don’t display that $50,000 fully loaded model only to encourage customers to add on expensive options—they also use it to make customers feel like they’re getting a deal if they walk away with a $35,000 version. You can use similar approaches to communicate the perceived value of your menu items.

Pricing is too important to be made as an arbitrary decision. And just because consumers have cut back on spending doesn’t mean pricing is simply a game of “how low can you go.” With a strategic approach, you can use price as a helpful tool in your brand-building toolbox.

Source: QSRmagazine.com - Denise Lee Yohn

5.2.09

Crisis in the luxury hotels: price conscious customers

According to Lisa Grossberg, who is the general manager of the five* Buckingham Hotel in New York, many companies started to renegotiate prices in function of the crisis in the last quarter of last year, including individual clients who became more price sensitive. Her story is confirmed by figures from Smith Travel Research, a market leader in statistical research for the hotel sector. For the second week of January, the 'average revenue per available room' in the U.S. was 16.4% lower than a year earlier. The 'average occupancy' decreased by 12.9% and the 'average room rate' by 4%. Luxury Hotels are undergoing even greater reductions. In this segment, the 'average occupancy' decreased by 24.4%, the room rate by 8.9%. The business world has been taking the necessary measures to cut on their travel budgets. Five* hotels are replaced by four* hotels, including the popular Sheraton and Hilton. A room in one of these two hotels will cost an average of 140 dollars today, compared with 270 dollars a year ago. But most chains use a number of exceptional deals to hide that their prices have been decreased. Luxury hotels have to be creative: some extras such as parking, Internet and the use of the gym are included in the price which was not the case upto last year.

‘In het laatste kwartaal van vorig jaar begon het. Bedrijven heronderhandelden onze prijzen in functie van de crisis, ook particulieren stelden zich prijsbewuster op. Dat zegt Lisa Grossberg, die general manager is van het vijfsterren Buckingham Hotel in New York. Haar verhaal wordt bevestigd door cijfers van Smith Travel Research, een marktleider in statistisch onderzoek in de hotelsector . Voor de tweede week van januari lag de ‘gemiddelde omzet per beschikbare kamer'- een geijkt begrip in de sector- in de VS 16,4% lager dan een jaar eerder. De gemiddelde bezetting daalde met 12,9% en de gemiddelde kamerprijs met 4%. Luxehotels ondergaan nog grotere dalingen. In dit segment daalde de gemiddelde bezetting met liefst 24,4%, de kamerprijs met 8,9%. Ook de zakenwereld heeft ondertussen de nodige maatregelen getroffen om besparingen te realiseren op reisbudgetten. Vijfsterrenarrangementen zijn vervangen door viersterrenhotels, waaronder de populaire Sheraton- en Hiltonformules. Een kamer in een van deze twee hotels kost vandaag gemiddeld 140 dollar, vergeleken met 270 dollar een jaar geleden. Maar de meeste ketens trachten via een aantal 'uitzonderlijke aanbiedingen' vooralsnog te verbergen dat ze hun prijzen hebben laten zakken. Om met dit soort ketens te concurreren moeten luxehotels zich creatief tonen: bepaalde extra's zoals parking, internetgebruik en het gebruik van een fitnessruimte zijn in tegenstelling tot vroeger in de prijzen begrepen.

14.1.09

Virgin Atlantic launches a price war

Virgin Atlantic has reduced the cost of flights in its business class cabin by up to 40 percent. In an attempt to secure bookings as the economic downturn deepens, Virgin has decided to slash Upper Class fares. Return flights to New York in business class are expected to be reduced by 40 percent to £1,099, while services to Boston will be available from £1,199, representing a price cut of 38 percent. BA is expected to follow suit by reducing its business class prices, despite stating in the past that it is opposed to cut-price premium services, according to Reuters. Andrew Fitchie, an aviation analyst at Collins Stewart, the broker, reportedly said: "It is a bit unnerving to see this level of discounting going on because they wouldn't be doing it without reason. Most of this cut is marketing and advertising driven, but if it feeds through to real price disruption, then that will start to affect margins." Recently, British Airways witnessed a fall in premium passenger traffic in December. Traffic comprised a 12.1 percent decrease in premium traffic and a 1.7 percent fall in non-premium traffic. The airline's premium traffic volumes have been falling heavily for four months but the pace of the decline accelerated in December with a drop of 12.1 percent year-on year. www.eyefortravel.com

16.12.08

Pricing Tables: Examples And Best Practices

Pricing tables play an important role for every company that offers products or services. They are a challenge from both a design and usability standpoint. They must be simple but at the same time clearly differentiate between features and prices of different products and services. A pricing table should help users pick the most appropriate plan for them. A company should carefully examine its product portfolio and pick the most important features to present in its pricing plans. Visitors should be given only the information they would be interested in: available features, options and costs. The rule of thumb is: every unnecessary cell in your pricing table increases the probability of losing potential customers, because you make it more difficult for them to compare various plans and select the best one. Once you have identified the most important features, go ahead and create a more detailed list of features for users who are interested in a particular plan. Users must know what kind of a product they are spending their money on and all of the features associated with it. For a good grounding in exactly how to design and present a pricing table, let’s examine some that other designers have created and analyze them according to the following important criteria: Design: colors, style, typography, icons. Usability: What happens if we turn off CSS and JavaScript? Is it still usable? You may also want to take a look at the following related articles: Navigation Menus: Trends and Examples Web Form Design: Modern Solutions and Creative Ideas Block Quotes and Pull Quotes: Examples and Good Practices Footers: Creative Ideas and Examples Pagination Gallery: Examples and Good Practices Tag Clouds Gallery: Examples and Good Practices Shopping Carts Gallery: Examples and Good Practices

2.10.08

EU wants to end the Belgian prohibition on cross-belt sales.

The European Commission wants that Belgium makes an end to the prohibition on cross-belt sales. Also, the sperperiode for the rebates must disappear. Because Belgium lingers about the implementation of these measures - after a first warning letter in 2007, - now an action procedure is being started because of the incomplete transposition of the European rules. The prohibition on cross-belt sales in Belgium dates back to 1971 and prohibits the sale of goods to extremely low prices in order to offer other products to the full price. Belgian courts have tried through the years to determine what exactly 'extreme low' means. EU-Commisioner for consumer policy, Meglena Kuneva says in an interview with the newspaper 'de Tijd' that Europe needs the support of the population for its policy. For example, take the liberalisation of the energy market. Meglena sees in Belgium much concern about the price of energy. There are a lot of complaints concerning expensive electricity bills of Electrabel. Meglena says, if we cannot translate the emancipation of the energy market in our purse, the population will support insufficient the liberalisation.

De Europese Commissie wil dat België een einde maakt aan het verbod op koppelverkoop. Ook de sperperiode voor de solden moeten verdwijnen. Omdat België talmt met het uitvoeren van deze maatregelen is ligt -na eerste waarschuwende brief in 2007- nu een inbreukprocedure klaar wegens de onvolledige omzetting van Europese regels. Het verbod op koppelverkoop in ons land dateert van 1971 en verbiedt de verkoop van goederen aan extreem lage prijzen teneinde andere producten aan de volle prijs te kunnen aanbieden. Belgische rechtbanken hebben jaren aan een stuk getracht uit te maken wat 'extreem laag' betekent. In een interview met de krant De Tijd zegt EU-Commissielid voor Consumentenbeleid, Meglena Kuneva, dat Europa voor zijn beleid de steun nodig heeft van de bevolking. ‘Neem nu de liberalisering van de energiemarkt. Ik merk ook in België veel bezorgdheid over de prijs van energie. We krijgen bijvoorbeeld heel wat klachten over dure elektriciteitsrekeningen van Electrabel. Welnu, als we de vrijmaking van de energiemarkt niet kunnen vertalen in onze portemonnee, zal de bevolking die liberalisering onvoldoende steunen.'

23.9.08

Microsoft once again reduces its prices for the Xbox360

Microsoft reduces the price of the Xbox 360 in Europe. It has been already the third time that MS has reduced the price of the Xbox 360 since the console has entered the market at the end of 2005. The console, Xbox 360 'Arcade' will cost € 179 instead of € 199, the other two versions, with a hard disk of 60 gigabyte and 120 gigabyte, cost as of now respectively € 239 (compared with € 269 ) and € 299 (against € 369). Earlier on, MS had reduced already its prices in U.S.A. and Japan.

Microsoft verlaagt de prijs van de Xbox 360 in Europa. Het is al de derde keer dat MS de prijs van de Xbox 360 verlaagt sinds de console eind 2005 op de markt kwam.Het basismodel, de Xbox 360 'Arcade', kost vanaf vrijdag nog 179 euro, in plaats van de huidige 199 euro. De twee andere versies, met een harde schijf van 60 gigabyte en 120 gigabyte, kosten voortaan respectievelijk 239 euro (tegenover 269 euro) en 299 euro (tegen 369 euro).Eerder haalde Microsoft ook al in de Verenigde Staten en in Japan de prijzen naar omlaag.

Source: http://www.hln.be/

26.6.08

100 dollar laptops has put the market upside down

The `100 dollar laptops `has changed the market for laptops serious. The magnificant design of it in combination with scale advantages makes it possible to produce derisionly-cheap laptops. The 100 dollars laptop are an initiative of Nicholas Negroponte, MIT-professor and founder of the nonprofit organisation One laptop by Child (OLPC). Although Negroponte already had planned it to introduce it in 2005, large-scale investments of governments stayed away. THE XO Laptop cost thus still 200 dollars and there only have been distributed 200 000 copies been distributed. Although Negropontes objectives of worldwide spreading the laptops in developing countries have not been obtained, has the XO the market for laptops broken open by reducing the prices strongly. Thus producing also HP, Intel, Asus and Pioneer computers now laptops against very low prices. According to Negroponte XO it has not become a success because Windows not supported the apparatus (the control system twist on Linux) and because governments do not want to deviate of Windows.

De zogeheten `100 dollar laptop` heeft de markt voor laptops ingrijpend veranderd. Het slimme ontwerp ervan in combinatie met schaalvoordelen maakt het mogelijk om laptops spotgoedkoop te produceren. De 100 dollar laptop is een vondst van Nicholas Negroponte, MIT-professor en oprichter van de non-profit organisatie One Laptop Per Child (OLPC). Hoewel Negroponte zijn plan al in 2005 introduceerde, bleven grootschalige investeringen van overheden uit. De XO laptop kost dan ook nog steeds 200 dollar en er zijn slechts 200.000 exemplaren gedistribueerd. Hoewel Negropontes doelstellingen van het wereldwijd verspreiden van laptops in ontwikkelingslanden niet zijn gehaald, heeft de XO de markt voor laptops ontegenzeggelijk opengebroken en de prijzen sterk verlaagd. Zo produceren nu ook HP, Intel, Asus en Pioneer Computers laptops tegen zeer lage prijzen. Volgens Negroponte is XO geen succes geworden doordat Windows het apparaat niet ondersteunde (het besturingssysteem draait immers op Linux) en omdat overheden niet van de Windowsstandaarden willen afwijken. Laat onverlet dat de OX veel navolging heeft. De kleine Asus Eee PC is iets groter dan een paperback boek, weegt minder dan een kilo en werd in 2007 door 300.000 consumenten gekocht. Het meest basale model met een 7 inch scherm kost 299 dollar. Bron: The Economist

Also Sony made 2.13 billion euro loss on the PlayStation 3 (but is making gradually up for it)

Sony has made no less than 2.13 billion euro loss on its game console, the PlayStation 3. The reason for this is that Sony sold it under the production price. That is a normal practice in the game industry, where the producers make especially profit on the games. Sony has spend especially much on research, by developing IBM with chips manufacturer Cell-chip. The company lost throw this way 1.39 billion euro in 2007, and 739 millions euro in 2008. Gradually, the game console starts to make profit, certainly now more copies are being sold and because it is cheaper to manufacture them.

Sony heeft maar liefst 2,13 miljard euro verlies gemaakt op zijn paradepaardje, de PlayStation 3. Het bedrijf verkocht de spelconsole immers onder de productieprijs. Dat is een normale praktijk in de gamesindustrie, waar de producenten vooral winst maken op games. Sony heeft vooral veel uitgegeven aan research, door samen met chipsfabrikant IBM de Cell-chip te ontwikkelen. Het bedrijf verloor zo 1,39 miljard euro in 2007, en 739 miljoen euro in 2008. Stilaan begint het apparaat echter richting winst te kruipen, zeker nu er meer exemplaren van worden verkocht en het goedkoper is om ze te maken.

(sam)

28.4.08

Apple misjudge themselves on European Price settings

The disappointing European sales of Apple's iPhone seem to ensure a strategic diversion. The American technology company would be prepared to give its share in the income from date movement up - that according to initiates can incur up to 30% -, in exchange of a system in which the smartphone for a lower, subsidised price can be sold, a practice (cross-belt sale) that is prohibited in our country. Both the French newspaper 'Les Echos', and Italie's 'La Reppublica' published reports in that sense, based on sources within respectively France Télécom and Telecom Italia. Also the differences between the national legislation make the use of a single sale strategy difficult. Thus customers in Germany and France can get hold of the rather expensive iPhone for a superior price, if they link themselves for a longer period to a telecomoperator. Customers in Italy refuse these long-term contracts and 90% of mobile users pay the their conversations in advance with prepaidcards. Last month, Apple has utilsed price falls through for the 8 gigabyteversion of the Iphone.

Apple verkijkt zich op Europese prijszetting De tegenvallende Europese verkopen van Apple’s iPhone lijken voor een strategische koerswijziging te zullen zorgen. Het Amerikaanse technologiebedrijf zou bereid zijn om haar aandeel in de inkomsten uit dataverkeer –dat volgens ingewijden kan oplopen tot 30%- op te geven, in ruil voor een systeem waarin de smartphone voor een lagere, gesubsidieerde prijs over de toonbank kan, een praktijk (koppelverkoop) die in ons land verboden is. Zowel de Franse zakenkrant Les Echos, als Italië’s La Reppublica publiceerden afgelopen dagen berichten in die zin, op basis van bronnen binnen respectievelijk France Télécom en Telecom Italia. Volgens onderzoeksbureau Gartner gaat het om een logische stap die Apple’s iPhone moet toelaten het Oude Continent te veroveren. Zowel Nokia als Sony Ericsson maakten afgelopen kwartaal gewag van een verminderde vraag naar dure toestellen. Ook de verschillen tussen de nationale wetgevingen maken het moeilijk om één enkele verkoopsstrategie te hanteren. Zo kunnen klanten in Duitsland en Frankrijk de nochtans dure iPhone voor een prijsje bemachtigen, als ze zich daaarbij voor langere tijd verbinden aan één enkele telecomoperator. In Italië weigeren klanten deze langdurige contracten aan te gaan en betalen 90% van de gsm-gebruikers hun gesprekken vooraf met een prepaidkaart. Volgens Strategy Analytics, een Brits onderzoeksbureau, zou Apple zowel in het laatste kwartaal van 2007, als het eerste kwartaal van 2008 zijn verkoopsprognose in Europa met meer dan 30% hebben gemist (350.000 verkochte toestellen tegen een prognose van 500.000). Vorige maand al voerde Apple in het VK en Duitsland belangrijke prijsdalingen door voor de 8 gigabyteversie van de iPhone.

Bron : Express.be